Stop SOPA & PIPA

Strike Against SOPA & PIPA

Today, we are striking against censorship. Join the largest online protest in history: tell Congress to stop this bill now!

Join The Strike! and add this to your site

Fight For The Future may contact you about future campaigns. We will never share your email with anyone. Privacy Policy

Learn More: Watch the video · American Censorship page · View the Infographic
Read SOPA on OpenCongress · Read PIPA on OpenCongress

The three most definitive articles on SOPA and PIPA: Free Speech, Problems, Security

Fight for the Future is a non-profit organization fighting for people's freedoms in a new digital age.

Monday, May 2, 2011

Champagne and Celebration at Ground Zero Following Death of Osama bin Laden

Powerful men are well advised not to use violence,
For violence has a habit of returning;
Thorns and weeds grow wherever an army goes,
And lean years follow a great war.

A general is well advised
To achieve nothing more than his orders:
Not to take advantage of his victory.
Nor to glory, boast or pride himself;
To do what is dictated by necessity,
But not by choice.

For even the strongest force will weaken with time,
And then its violence will return, and kill it.


                      The Tao Te Ching, Chapter 30: Violence



Diane Massaroli stood out from those around her on Church Street in Lower Manhattan, a soft-spoken woman with a patient stance, carrying a portrait of her husband, Michael. On that Tuesday morning nearly ten years ago, as she was preparing her children for school, her phone rang. She was unable to answer it in time, and missed the call. It had been her husband, Michael Massaroli, a VP for Cantor Fitzgerald, who was working on the 101st floor of the World Trade Center.

Last night Diane made her way to Ground Zero and stood by quietly while people gathered to celebrate the news that Osama bin Laden, widely recognized as the architect of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, had been killed in an operation conducted by US Navy SEALs and authorized by President Obama.

"We've been waiting nine years, seven months, and twenty days for this day," Diane said last night. "I never thought I would see this day in my lifetime, but I can only hope we're able to open a new chapter because of it."

Her demeanor in this bittersweet moment, as that of many 9/11 victim's families, seemed in direct contrast to the cheering, chanting and singing of the largely youthful crowd. Periodic chants of "U-S-A" and "Obama got Osama" cycled in between the singing of the Star-Spangled Banner or God Bless America, the popping of champagne corks and the waving of signs and flags. It was this generation of 18-25 year olds who defined these first, sudden outpourings of raw emotion across the country.

After a nearly 10-year hunt, the word that Osama bin Laden had been killed was met with spontaneous scenes of jubilation by many Americans. Given the often xenophobic character of the protests that had opposed plans for the construction of a mosque near Ground Zero just a year before, people can be forgiven the assumption that these rallies would be more of the same; they were anything but. Few there had ever sung the national anthem except to mouth the words at professional sporting events. They sang off key, forgetting some of the words, mangling others. But that didn't matter tonight. They waved whatever American flags they could find (including one oddly with a portrait of Marilyn Monroe), and climbed traffic light posts, while others, falling back to concert traditions, crowd-surfed. Children of first generation Middle Eastern immigrants, Latinos, Asian-Americans, African-Americans, whites, Muslims, Jews -- and even the odd Canadian -- all shared one thing in common that night: overwhelming relief and joy that Osama bin Laden, the one who masterminded the destruction that lead to the death of over 3,000 people on that very spot nearly ten years ago, had finally gotten what was coming to him.

More often than not, they had not lost a loved one at Ground Zero, but you could tell from people's faces who had and who had not. Many though, either were or knew others in active duty military service in Iraq or Afghanistan. For the most part, those gathered were of a generation who can scarcely remember the world that existed before September 11th, and yet have had their entire being shaped by that event and the subsequent wars. For them, far more than the older observers and participants, this was not an end, but a beginning finally made possible.


The diversity of those present was in sharp contrast to the divisions and preconceptions that have been built up and propagated over the past ten years, and what it means to American society. We have been divided for far too long. That division has often been tinged with racism and bigotry, questions of patriotism and accusations of treason, the mistrust and labeling of others, to the point where it is inseparable in the minds of many from the people taking either side. If you agree with one idea, you are a traitor and a terrorist sympathizer; if you agree with the other, you are bigot and fascist.

No one present that night, perhaps, had challenged those preconceptions more than Lieutenant Daniel Choi. The son of a Korean-American Baptist minister, Choi graduated West Point in 2003 and served in the 10th Mountain Division in Iraq. In March 2009, he came out as homosexual on The Rachel Maddow Show. As a result, he was discharged from the Army and began active opposition to the policy of "don't ask, don't tell." After its repeal, his commission was reinstated and in December 2010, he submitted a request to re-enlist.

Last night at Ground Zero, Lieutenant Choi climbed a traffic light above the crowd in full military uniform and lead those assembled in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance, to rousing cheers. If that in itself offends some, then I'm not sure what to say, except that this was not a rally of bigots, shouting simply to satisfy some twisted quest for racial or religious vengeance. I fault no one for private misgivings about how they wish to mark this event, but I've seen more misplaced patriotism in a bar on St. Patrick's Day than there that night, but despite this, the Internet critics are already in overdrive.


In editorials, on blog posts, in online communities and comments sites, many have decried the celebrations of the death of Osama bin Laden as inappropriate, barbaric or worse. The sentiment is described as a kind of morbid, visceral act, and the people who express joy at his end as some form of sociopath. A celebration of vengeance, not justice. Offensive. Jingoistic.

When I sent my 81-year old father the videos above, he said it sounded just like V-J Day in 1945 that he remembered from when he was 15. Watching the night unfold in front of the big hole in the ground where the World Trade Center once loomed, I thought of that famous Times Square photograph of a sailor kissing a nurse while dipping her in his arms. That moment came on the heels of a 6-year long war in which over 60 million people were killed, including as many as 200,000 or more from the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki alone. If any celebration might be considered morbid revelry, V-J Day would make a far stronger contender, but it isn't. Those celebrations marked the final end of the most destructive war in human history, as well as the evil men who began it. Of all the appropriate times for mass celebration, this is one of them.

Now, for anyone who has never wished ill upon another human being ever, or has never lifted one finger or paid one cent that's been used to harm another, you have to be a virgin saint (and likely, you're also evading taxes). But for the rest of us, hearing that THE person who caused so much pain and trauma to our city and to the people in it has finally met a well-deserved and inglorious end IS something to be welcomed. Pass the champagne.

Let's not forget how others in the world have commented on this. Kenyan President Mwai Kibaki said: "[bin Laden's] killing is an act of justice to those Kenyans who lost their lives and the many more who suffered injuries [in the Nairobi bombings]." From Iraq's foreign minister, Hoshyar Zebari: "We, like many people in the world, are delighted to see an end to his mentality and his devious ideology. Thousands of Iraqis were murdered and killed because of his ideologies." Similar statements have been made throughout the world, from Lebanon to Russia. In fact, the only statements expressing misgivings about his death are from the Pakistani Taliban, Hamas, and the Venezuelan government. Not surprising.

I want nothing more than for men like Dick Cheney to be wrong, that this is not "a war without end," with no possibility of peace, ever, because the alternative is nothing but the choice between nihilism and authoritarianism or the cynical comfort of recursive conspiracy theories. Real justice would be ridding the world of all evil, all war, all the horrors we've created. But I'll settle for this one moment right now.

So, as for Osama bin Laden, let him pass unmourned, a violent man whose violence returned, and killed him.

Addendum: One contrast that was immediately apparent in retrospect, but largely unremarked in the editorializing (myself included) over the tenor of the celebrations by ordinary people, was the precise lack of spectacle to Obama's statement regarding the event in comparison to President Bush's flamboyant 'Mission Accomplished' carrier landing exactly eight years ago on the USS Abraham Lincoln. The glory-hounding swagger, boasting and pride displayed in that 2003 speech was almost entirely absent from Obama's statement, and all the more remarkable given the nature of each: in 2003, the Iraq War had hardly begun, while the end of Osama bin Laden is quite definitive.

Speaking to my own father, who was an 11 year old New Yorker when Pearl Harbor was attacked, and 15 years old with an older brother in the Merchant Marine for both V-E Day, the news of Hitler's death and V-J Day, was also instructive. I asked him what people's reactions were to those events, and he said this:

My dad: "Oh, when people heard of Hitler's death, they went wild. This was followed by V-E Day and everyone I can remember around there at the time was celebrating in the streets. It was more subdued because, especially in Europe, soldiers figured they would be shipped off to the Pacific immediately. So a lot of people took Hitler's death in stride because the war wasn't really over."

Me: "How about V-J Day?"

My dad: "For V-J Day, everyone went crazy at the news of that. [World War Two] was a horrendous war, and we nearly damn well lost it, if Hitler hadn't been such a fat stupid fool, but we nearly lost it if a few things had been different. I was against the use of the atom bomb - I thought it could have been just as effective if we had demonstrated what we had off the coast or on a mountain - but generals at the time were expecting a million casualties if we had tried to invade Japan. And these were celebrations all over, in England as well as the US. People definitely celebrated Hitler's death - he was Hitler. And I think a lot of people have the same reaction to this now, and maybe see it as the end of the war in a way."

Me: "Someone on a site I read compared it to Star Wars where the Ewoks celebrate when the Death Star blew up."

My dad: "Oh sure. That's right. I think it was a lot like that where the things [Ewoks] cheered when the Death Star blew up. I think that's a good analogy."

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hey man - I like the article. It's a solid piece of writing.

I find myself wrestling with my feelings on this. I'm not cheering Bin Laden's death, because bad as he is, he's still a human being - someone's son, someone's dad. I know they're hurting, and I don't wish that on anyone. Plus, he was good enough to be on our side of the fight for decades - someone saw enough good/use in him once upon a time.

Still, the son of a bitch richly deserved his end. Violent men reach violent ends, and for attacking innocents, he forfeits his own life. I won't shed any tears for him, and I truly hope that his death leads the world a step away from violence.

Neither will I pretend he is objectively "worse" than any other megalomaniac. His innocent body count is well below that of ex-President Bush, for example, but you won't see a raid of his house anytime soon! It's a subjective judgment based on the viewpoint that American lives are sacred, and those of other peoples aren't worth spit. Bin Laden might be a bastard, but he's never been the biggest bastard. I hate his icon and his ideology far more than the man himself.

I don't believe that this ends anything - the man has not been a part of the fight for years, and we're not fighting Al Queda so much as we're fighting locals in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Iraq, and now Libya. I doubt there are 100 people on this planet who could legitimately claim to be in "Al Queda."

Anyway, thanks for the good read - someone posted your article on reddit and I liked it. Cheers. -k

JournalSquared said...

Anon - I think most people are conflicted over how to feel about this. I suppose I don't think too much of OBL family's grief at that; if my dad had decided to become a religious fanatic and abandon my family to commit criminal acts of mass murder, I wouldn't be that supportive. I say this as a secular American, because... I'm a secular American. But I respect the right of others to take this as they may.

I think the invasion of Iraq was criminal - it had no basis in any kind of international law and was based on pure lies. Part of this is that Bush stated OBL was the primary objective, but that all seemed to be a ruse by 2002 once Bush publicly stated he wasn't worth the effort. It felt as if OBL was the decoy used to justify the Bush family vendetta against Saddam Hussein. Another way of looking at it is that Obama upheld a promise to the American people that Bush made and seemed to promptly break.

All in all, the passage from the Tao Te Ching stands, and we need to remember that. We are an empire, whether we appreciate the fact or not, and empires have enemies that must be dealt with. If not, Rome gets sacked. Caesar brought Vercingetorix back to Rome in a cage, imprisoned him for 5 years and then had him publicly paraded through the streets in 46 BC before he was executed by strangulation. Caesar himself lasted only two more years before his murder in 44 BC.